---
title: "Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible"
author: "Robert Jamieson, A. R. Fausset and David Brown"
languages: [en]
shelf: "Commentaries"
section: 684 of 927
url: https://scriptura.si/works/jamieson-fausset-brown-commentary-critical-and-explanatory-on-the-whole-bible/684/
cite: "Robert Jamieson, A. R. Fausset and David Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible, section 684. Scriptura (scriptura.si), https://scriptura.si/works/jamieson-fausset-brown-commentary-critical-and-explanatory-on-the-whole-bible/684/"
---

# Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible

*Robert Jamieson, A. R. Fausset and David Brown*

The Victorian standard commentary, critical and practical, from Genesis to Revelation.

## 684. Romans · 1 of 22

Source: https://scriptura.si/works/jamieson-fausset-brown-commentary-critical-and-explanatory-on-the-whole-bible/684/ · cite a paragraph as https://scriptura.si/works/jamieson-fausset-brown-commentary-critical-and-explanatory-on-the-whole-bible/684/#p-N

### The Epistle of Paul the Apostle to the Romans

[¶1] Commentary by David Brown

### Introduction

[¶3] The Genuineness of the Epistle to the Romans has never been questioned. It has the unbroken testimony of all antiquity, up to Clement of Rome, the apostle's "fellow laborer in the Gospel, whose name was in the Book of Life" ([Php 4:3]), and who quotes from it in his undoubted Epistle to the Corinthians, written before the close of the first century. The most searching investigations of modern criticism have left it untouched.

[¶4] When and Where this Epistle was written we have the means of determining with great precision, from the Epistle itself compared with the Acts of the Apostles. Up to the date of it the apostle had never been at Rome ([Ro 1:11], 13, 15). He was then on the eve of visiting Jerusalem with a pecuniary contribution for its Christian poor from the churches of Macedonia and Achaia, after which his purpose was to pay a visit to Rome on his way to Spain ([Ro 15:23-28]). Now this contribution we know that he carried with him from Corinth, at the close of his third visit to that city, which lasted three months ([Ac 20:2], ; ). On this occasion there accompanied him from Corinth certain persons whose names are given by the historian of the Acts ([Ac 20:4]), and four of these are expressly mentioned in our Epistle as being with the apostle when he wrote it--Timotheus, Sosipater, Gaius, and Erastus ([Ro 16:21], ). Of these four, the third, Gaius, was an inhabitant of Corinth ([1Co 1:14]), and the fourth, Erastus, was "chamberlain of the city" ([Ro 16:23]), which can hardly be supposed to be other than Corinth. Finally, Phoebebe, the bearer, as appears, of this Epistle, was a deaconess of the Church at Cenchrea, the eastern port of Corinth ([Ro 16:1]). Putting these facts together, it is impossible to resist the conviction, in which all critics agree, that Corinth was the place from which the Epistle was written, and that it was despatched about the close of the visit above mentioned, probably in the early spring of the year 58.

[¶5] The Founder of this celebrated church is unknown. That it owed its origin to the apostle Peter, and that he was its first bishop, though an ancient tradition and taught in the Church of Rome as a fact not to be doubted, is refuted by the clearest evidence, and is given up even by candid Romanists. On that supposition, how are we to account for so important a circumstance being passed by in silence by the historian of the Acts, not only in the narrative of Peter's labors, but in that of Paul's approach to the metropolis, of the deputations of Roman "brethren" that came as far as Appii Forum and the Three Taverns to meet him, and of his two years' labors there ([Ac 28:15], )? And how, consistently with his declared principle--not to build on another man's foundation ([Ro 15:20])--could he express his anxious desire to come to them that he might have some fruit among them also, even as among other Gentiles ([Ro 1:13]), if all the while he knew that they had the apostle of the circumcision for their spiritual father? And how, if so, is there no salutation to Peter among the many in this Epistle? or, if it may be thought that he was known to be elsewhere at that particular time, how does there occur in all the Epistles which our apostle afterwards wrote from Rome not one allusion to such an origin of the church at Rome? The same considerations would seem to prove that this church owed its origin to no prominent Christian laborer; and this brings us to the much-litigated question.

[¶6] For What Class of Christians was this Epistle principally designed--Jewish or Gentile? That a large number of Jews and Jewish proselytes resided at this time at Rome is known to all who are familiar with the classical and Jewish writers of that and the immediately subsequent periods; and that those of them who were at Jerusalem on the day of Pentecost ([Ac 2:10]), and formed probably part of the three thousand converts of that day, would on their return to Rome carry the glad tidings with them, there can be no doubt. Nor are indications wanting that some of those embraced in the salutations of this Epistle were Christians already of long standing, if not among the earliest converts to the Christian faith. Others of them who had made the apostle's acquaintance elsewhere, and who, if not indebted to him for their first knowledge of Christ, probably owed much to his ministrations, seemed to have charged themselves with the duty of cherishing and consolidating the work of the Lord in the capital. And thus it is not improbable that up to the time of the apostle's arrival the Christian community at Rome had been dependent upon subordinate agency for the increase of its numbers, aided by occasional visits of stated preachers from the provinces; and perhaps it may be gathered from the salutations of the last chapter that it was up to that time in a less organized, though far from less flourishing state, than some other churches to whom the apostle had already addressed Epistles. Certain it is, that the apostle writes to them expressly as a Gentile Church ([Ro 1:13], ; , ); and though it is plain that there were Jewish Christians among them, and the whole argument presupposes an intimate acquaintance on the part of his readers with the leading principles of the Old Testament, this will be sufficiently explained by supposing that the bulk of them, having before they knew the Lord been Gentile proselytes to the Jewish faith, had entered the pale of the Christian Church through the gate of the ancient economy.

[¶7] It remains only to speak briefly of the Plan and Character Of this Epistle. Of all the undoubted Epistles of our apostle, this is the most elaborate, and at the same time the most glowing. It has just as much in common with a theological treatise as is consistent with the freedom and warmth of a real letter. Referring to the headings which we have prefixed to its successive sections, as best exhibiting the progress of the argument and the connection of its points, we here merely note that its first great topic is what may be termed the legal relation of man to God as a violator of His holy law, whether as merely written on the heart, as in the case of the heathen, or, as in the case of the Chosen People, as further known by external revelation; that it next treats of that legal relation as wholly reversed through believing connection with the Lord Jesus Christ; and that its third and last great topic is the new life which accompanies this change of relation, embracing at once a blessedness and a consecration to God which, rudimentally complete already, will open, in the future world, into the bliss of immediate and stainless fellowship with God. The bearing of these wonderful truths upon the condition and destiny of the Chosen People, to which the apostle next comes, though it seem but the practical application of them to his kinsmen according to the flesh, is in some respects the deepest and most difficult part of the whole Epistle, carrying us directly to the eternal springs of Grace to the guilty in the sovereign love and inscrutable purposes of God; after which, however, we are brought back to the historical platform of the visible Church, in the calling of the Gentiles, the preservation of a faithful Israelitish remnant amidst the general unbelief and fall of the nation, and the ultimate recovery of all Israel to constitute, with the Gentiles in the latter day, one catholic Church of God upon earth. The remainder of the Epistle is devoted to sundry practical topics, winding up with salutations and outpourings of heart delightfully suggestive.

### Chapter 1

### Ro 1:1-17. Introduction

[¶10] 1. Paul--(See on [Ac 13:9]).

[¶11] a servant of Jesus Christ--The word here rendered "servant" means "bond-servant," or one subject to the will and wholly at the disposal of another. In this sense it is applied to the disciples of Christ at large ([1Co 7:21-23]), as in the Old Testament to all the people of God ([Is 66:14]). But as, in addition to this, the prophets and kings of Israel were officially "the servants of the Lord" ([Jos 1:1]; [Psa 18:1], title), the apostles call themselves, in the same official sense, "the servants of Christ" (as here, and [Php 1:1]; [Jas 1:1]; [2Pe 1:1]; Jude 1), expressing such absolute subjection and devotion to the Lord Jesus as they would never have yielded to a mere creature. (See on [Ro 1:7]; [Joh 5:22], ).

[¶12] called to be an apostle--when first he "saw the Lord"; the indispensable qualification for apostleship. (See on [Ac 9:5]; [Ac 22:14]; [1Co 9:1]).

[¶13] separated unto the--preaching of the

[¶14] gospel--neither so late as when "the Holy Ghost said, Separate me Barnabas and Saul" ([Ac 13:2]), nor so early as when "separated from his mother's womb" (see on [Ga 1:15]). He was called at one and the same time to the faith and the apostleship of Christ ([Ac 26:16-18]).

[¶15] of God--that is, the Gospel of which God is the glorious Author. (So [Ro 15:16]; [1Th 2:2], [8, 9]; [1Pe 4:17]).

[¶16] 2. Which he had promised afore ... in the holy scriptures--Though the Roman Church was Gentile by nation (see on [Ro 1:13]), yet as it consisted mostly of proselytes to the Jewish faith (see on Introduction to this Epistle), they are here reminded that in embracing Christ they had not cast off, but only the more profoundly yielded themselves to, Moses and the prophets ([Ac 13:32], ).

[¶17] 3-4. Concerning his Son Jesus Christ our Lord--the grand burden of this "Gospel of God."

[¶18] made of the seed of David--as, according to "the holy scriptures," He behooved to be. (See on [Mt 1:1]).

[¶19] according to the flesh--that is, in His human nature (compare [Ro 9:5]; [Joh 1:14]); implying, of course, that He had another nature, of which the apostle immediately proceeds to speak.

[¶20] 5. By whom--as the ordained channel.

[¶21] we have received grace--the whole "grace that bringeth salvation" ([Tit 2:11]).

[¶22] and apostleship--for the publication of that "grace," and the organization of as many as receive it into churches of visible discipleship. (We prefer thus taking them as two distinct things, and not, with some good interpreters, as one--"the grace of apostleship").

[¶23] for obedience to the faith--rather, "for the obedience of faith"--that is, in order to men's yielding themselves to the belief of God's saving message, which is the highest of all obedience.

[¶24] for his name--that He might be glorified.

[¶25] 6. Among whom are ye also--that is, along with others; for the apostle ascribes nothing special to the Church of Rome (compare [1Co 14:36]) [Bengel].

[¶26] the called--(See on [Ro 8:30]).

[¶27] of Christ Jesus--that is, either called "by Him" ([Joh 5:25]), or the called "belonging to Him"; "Christ's called ones." Perhaps this latter sense is best supported, but one hardly knows which to prefer.

[¶28] 7. beloved of God--(Compare [De 33:12]; [Col 3:12]).

[¶29] Grace, &c.--(See on [Joh 1:14]).

[¶30] and peace--the peace which Christ made through the blood of His cross ([Col 1:20]), and which reflects into the believing bosom "the peace of God which passeth all understanding" ([Php 4:7]).

[¶31] from God our Father, and the Lord Jesus Christ--"Nothing speaks more decisively for the divinity of Christ than these juxtapositions of Christ with the eternal God, which run through the whole language of Scripture, and the derivation of purely divine influences from Him also. The name of no man can be placed by the side of the Almighty. He only, in whom the Word of the Father who is Himself God became flesh, may be named beside Him; for men are commanded to honor Him even as they honor the Father ([Joh 5:23])" [Olshausen].

[¶32] 8. your faith is spoken of throughout the whole world--This was quite practicable through the frequent visits paid to the capital from all the provinces; and the apostle, having an eye to the influence they would exercise upon others, as well as their own blessedness, given thanks for such faith to "his God through Jesus Christ," as being the source, according to his theology of faith, as of all grace in men.

[¶33] 9. For God ... whom I serve--the word denotes religious service.

[¶34] with my spirit--from my inmost soul.

[¶35] in the gospel of his Son--to which Paul's whole religious life and official activity were consecrated.

[¶36] is my witness, that without ceasing I make mention of you always in my prayers--so for the Ephesians ([Ep 1:15], ); so for the Philippians ([Php 1:3], ); so for the Colossians ([Col 1:3], ); so for the Thessalonians ([1Th 1:2], ). What catholic love, what all-absorbing spirituality, what impassioned devotion to the glory of Christ among men!

[¶37] 10. Making request, if by any means now at length I may have a prosperous journey by the will of God, to come to you--Though long anxious to visit the capital, he met with a number of providential hindrances ([Ro 1:13]; [Ro 15:22]; and see on [Ac 19:21]; [Ac 23:11]; [Ac 28:15]); insomuch that nearly a quarter of a century elapsed, after his conversion, ere his desire was accomplished, and that only as "a prisoner of Jesus Christ." Thus taught that his whole future was in the hands of God, he makes it his continual prayer that at length the obstacles to a happy and prosperous meeting might be removed.

[¶38] 11-12. For I long to see you, that I may impart to you some spiritual gift--not any supernatural gift, as the next clause shows, and compare [1Co 1:7].

[¶39] to the end that ye may be established.

[¶40] 13. oftentimes I purposed to come unto you, but was let--hindered.

[¶41] hitherto--chiefly by his desire to go first to places where Christ was not known ([Ro 15:20-24]).

[¶42] that I might have some fruit--of my ministry

[¶43] among you also, even as among other Gentiles--The Gentile origin of the Church at Rome is here so explicitly stated, that those who conclude, merely from the Jewish strain of the argument, that they must have been mostly Israelites, decide in opposition to the apostle himself. (But see on Introduction to this Epistle.)

[¶44] 14-15. I am debtor both to the Greeks--cultivated